Where are those 787 billion?

Inits weekly circulation Barrak Obama said it is unrealistic to expect his economic program to yield just four months.
The explanation is not peace but his compatriots, said Zyuddoyche Zeitung, cited by Deutsche Welle.
Barrak Obama done in the present global politics, only in America that failed to spark interest. There is another agenda. „What happened to those 787 billion dollars?“ – Issue of Business Week magazine refers to the giant package to restore the economy, adopted at the beginning of the administration of Obama. Indeed, while the president around the world, at home his climax great debates about the state of the U.S. economy.
These debates are Obama for fire. Several influential Democrats now insist even more grant money. Economic savetnichka President Laura Taysan example suggests that these 787 billion was too small. Major cause of concern among Democrats was unexpectedly sharp rise in unemployment. In June it reached 9.5 percent and experts know that will soon exceed 10 percent margin – a level unseen for at least a quarter of a century now.
This in itself is unpleasant enough, but becomes worse because the person Obama predicts no more than 8.5% bezrabotitsa.Vprochem no other, and vice-president, has talent in their desire to speak truthfully, to say wrong – it was he gave impetus to the current debate. Joe Baydan said on television that in the beginning of the year was Obama administration underestimated the scale of economic catastrophe. Doubts in the course of Obama is fueled by two sides. On one side of restless Democrats who believe that the president should do more debts to arrive at a visible movement of the economy to elections for Congress next year.
On the other – from the opposition republikantsi who argue that the huge aid package was just throwing money in the wind – and show the figures for unemployment. They consider such requests for the second set as definitive proof of the inability of Democrats to handle pari.Ne only for the approval of voters depends on the success of his economic course.
Discussion threatens its ambitious – and expensive – projects to reform health care in the field of ecology. All this hardly could be funded at the same time. But in case of doubt, some Democrats would be willing to sacrifice reforms.

––––––––––––––––– ––––––––––

Finance